New Message

Click on the message to view / write comments
Posted byCategoryMessageComments Received
Ansari Irshad Ahmed
WTR,Mumbai
9423992208
Date:28/08/2016
Policy Sir, Please tell the date of implementation of CPSU CH,wheather it will solve our Ist time bound injustice which we got after 6 years?0
KSVS RAMAKRISHNA
ELR
9490134343
Date:25/08/2016
Policy Sir if promotions were delinked with avalabilty of no of posts then, 67% 33% promotions i.e. scf and ldce would be treated as abolished. Then to days ldce candidates position? If to days ldce is taken into account for postings. Then what is the validy of DPC VACANCIES? Pl clarify the policy.0
S.G.MENON
nagpur
9422101003
Date:25/08/2016
Policy sir In CPSU cadre hiherarchy Employees who are already in E4/E5 Scale with APR score of 8.5 and above out 10 and with outstanding,excellent grading for the last 5 years may be pramoted directly as AGM and DGM regulary while implementing the same This is the only way we can resolve the issue and the candidates who are genuine will get pramoted and this will surely show drastic change in BSNL IN this their should not be problem since the employees who might have achieved this may be the real eligible candidates which will be good for BSNL1
A.Ramalingam SDE Rasipuram
Rasipuram, Salem SSA TamilNadu
9486103063
Date:23/08/2016
Others SDE Officiating spells increment cut and the recovery is deducted from pay till date of August 2016, My retirement is the October 2016. Now my VC clearance given with a recovery of remaining pending amount of 60,000/=. Last eleven months my pay recovery is nearly 2,00,000/= When order to be issued for stopping the recovery of payment.Kindly clarify Sir.1
s g menon
nagpur
9422101003
Date:20/08/2016
Policy THE BEST WAY TO FIGHT WITH DOT IS TO DEMAND CANCELLAION OF P.O. AND BACK TO DOT.THEN ONLY THE PROBLEMS WILL BE RESOLVED.DEMAND FOR IMPLIMENTATION OF 7TH CPRC .THEN ONLY THEY WILL REALISE THE ACTUAL FACTS THAT THE PEOPLE WHO HAS FOLLOWED THE ORDERS OF GOVT ARE SUFFERERS AND THE PEOPLE WHO OUT RIGHTLY REFUSED THE GOVT ARE BENEFITTING.BY THIS PROCESS THE ACTUAL MESSAGE GOING OUT IS NEVER EVER TRUST YOUR GOVT ON THE DAY.SORRY STATE OF AFFAIRS1
Ansari Irshad Ahmed
Mumbai
09423992208
Date:17/08/2016
Policy Respected GS Sir, Now the E2,E3 pay scales got rejected,not even a single recommendation got approved of KHAN Committee.For Ist time bound promotions also,they are saying will be processed after CPSU cadre hirarchy implementation.What is the logic for waiting till implementation of CPSU C.H.if it is not implemented then?Why dont you pursue Ist Time bound case seperately?There is nothing left for us except going into the court of LAW.2
Rajesj
Rohtak
9416010630
Date:17/08/2016
Others Immediately start agitation to stop the payment of 7th pay commission. When there is no money , with BSNL to pay the LTC to BSNL employee then how BSNL is paying 7TH pay commission and allowances like LTC non BSNL employee. This is total failure of association. It is dead sure that 3PRC will not be paid by BSNL. Moderator is requested not to stop this message. 1
jagdish.G.Bhambhani
Bhuj
9427216636
Date:12/08/2016
Policy Sub: Grant of promotion orders from JTO ( C ) to SDE ( C ) on regular basis under senority cum Fitness Stream (67% quota) Ref: PGM ( BW) BSNL Corporate Office order Trans.pro/SDE ( C )/M/(BW 1)/06-16 Dt 5-8-16 Sirs,As per corporate office personnel section letter no 412/10 /2009 pers. I dt 23rd March 2010 Sr no 2 Bhuj Kachchh Gujarat is declared as tenure station As per corporate office personnel section letter no 412/10 /2009 pers.I dt 9th May 2012 Sr no 7 Bhuj Kachchh Gujarat is declared as tenure station There is decline to review my two tenures spent at hard stations and still holding additional charge of JTO ( C ), of Bhuj Kutch Gujarat declared as tenure station and As per corporate office personnel section letter no 412/10 /2009 pers. I dt 23rd March 2010 Sr no 2 Bhuj Kachchh Gujarat is declared as tenure station and As per corporate office personnel section letter no 412/10 /2009 pers.I dt 9th May 2012 Sr no 7 Bhuj Kachchh Gujarat is declared as tenure station stating that the period may be counted as circle break Unfortunately deprived from promotion in Gujarat state inspite of being ahead ( Sr 2) in Merit and seniority the allocated promotion is Himachal pradesh for Sr no 1 & 2 thereby depriving from privilage of seniority0
J.G.BHAMBHANI
BHUJ kachchh Gujarat
9427216636
Date:12/08/2016
Policy Sub: Grant of promotion orders from JTO ( C ) to SDE ( C ) on regular basis under senority cum Fitness Stream (67% quota) Ref: PGM ( BW) BSNL Corporate Office order Trans.pro/SDE ( C )/M/(BW 1)/06-16 Dt 5-8-16 As per corporate office personnel section letter no 412/10 /2009 pers I dt 23rd March 2010 Sr no 2 Bhuj (Kachchh) Gujarat is declared as tenure station and also As per corporate office personnel section letter no 412/10 /2009 pers I dt 9th May 2012 Sr no 7 Bhuj (Kachchh) Gujarat is declared as tenure station The decline to review two tenures spent at hard stations ( 26-10-1999 to 11-9-2003 at Bhuj Tenure station and 10-5-2009 to 31-5-2014) and still holding additional charge of JTO ( C ), of Bhuj Kutch Gujarat declared as tenure station and as per corporate office personnel section letter no 412/10 /2009 pers. I dt 23rd March 2010 Sr no 2 Bhuj Kachchh Gujarat declared as tenure station a1so as per corporate office personnel section letter no 412/10 /2009 pers.I dt 9th May 2012 Sr no 7 Bhuj Kachchh Gujarat declared as tenure station stating that the period may be counted as circle break tenure Unfortunately deprived from promotion in Gujarat state preferably Subdivision Bhuj ( existing vacancy) at own cost, being 2nd in promotion list 2015-2016 due to non consideration of same0
Shamim Ahmad
Patna
9431200395
Date:12/08/2016
Others Sir, seen the updated Seniority list no. 8 uploaded on 04/08/2016. Several SDEs who passed LDCE as SDE against previous vacancy year allotted in previous list 8 as PQ vacancy year. We have represented that when JTOs got CQ vacancy year then why SDEs got PQ vacancy year. As per SC decision if date of joining is seniority criteria then ok no matter, but CQ vacancy year may be allotted to such SDEs who passed CQ exam as SDE. But surprised to see that in such cases " CQ 07 SEN CANCELLED" mentioned in Remarks column of updated Seniority list no. 8 in all 124 candidates. Why? Whether our CQ exam 2007 cancelled? Where is cancellation letter? What are the charges for cancellaltion of our CQ exam 2007? It is very painful sir. Some suitable words may be mentioned in place of CANCELLED or it will be better if no meaning of vancay year then why carrying sir. Why not vacancy year column deleted. PLEASE TRY TO MODIFY ......0
KSVS RAMAKRISHNA
ELR
9490134343
Date:12/08/2016
Others The DPC cases listed for hearing in weekly, but not coming to hearing since 3 weeks. What is going on cases at ernakulam. 0
Prem Kumar
Ahmedabad
9412256345
Date:04/08/2016
Organisational Just now gone through the SNEA reply to 3rd PRC questionnaire. It seems our union has already accepted the defeat. We are pleading for 2012 pay scales. Quite surprising. No PRC. NO to BSNL. Lets go back to DOT. These losses are not our fault. So we should not be made victims.0
srinath
Bangalore
9483547799
Date:28/07/2016
Organisational One of SDE ended his life due to our great HR managers. This is not suicide but murder. I dont think, any one ll take responsibility for this irresponsible behaviour from BSNL admin. They relax at AC rooms forcing JTO/SDEs away from their families and home towns for years. Some one should be made responsible and put criminal case on them to avoid these kind of incidents in future. 9
U K PANDA
NAGALAND
9485232919
Date:23/07/2016
Others In the present scenario due to various court cases, promotions from JTO to SDE and SDE to DE is not possible immediately. The only solution is one time placement in the cadre of SDE to all JTOs who are in E3 or above scale . Similarly all SDE who are in E5 or above scale may be placed as DE as one time measure . After completion of court cases the same may be regularised, if required . GS SNEA has already started the movement in this regard. But it seems matter is going to cold storage as usual .Now, it requires some more seriousness and acceleration form SNEA. We must pressurise as well as support GS SNEA to move forward. 0
R SUNDARESAN
CHENNAI
9442114100
Date:21/07/2016
Others In the adhoc DGM Promotion many of our officers who have got promotion were posted outside the parent circle. Some of these officers were posted outside the circles during the STS promotion also and spent more than 2 years and came back to parent circle. Again they were disturbed. Association should bring these issues to the administration. Also those officers who were not willing, should be allowed to decline. It is the matter of concern for everybody who have completed 55 years of age. Association should not be a silent spectator on this issue. It is the known fact that there is no binding in the TBP order that officers getting TBP should not dicline the normal promotion. This sort of promotion instead bringing cheer t brings torture and nuisance effect. Association should put an end to this sort of torture during the fag end of service of our officers 1
S.G.MENON
nagpur
9422101003
Date:25/07/2016
Policy snea should warn the govt by saying that if govt is going to cheat us then we should demand that our PO may be cancelled and we should be back to DOT. and serve notice for going on strike .and we should mobilise all govt psu which is running in loss due to so called grrrr8 govt policies and Unite all unions (railway /ioc/Air india----etc) and fight with the so called declared rulers and show them the real strength of unity.0
S.G.MENON
nagpur
9422101003
Date:21/07/2016
Policy if dot is playing tricks in delaying taking decision of standard pay scales implimentation and removal of 60: 40 in pension of absorbed employees then it is better that GS should take a decision of cancellation of PO. and demand to get absorbed back to DOT.just like prasar bharati. Then only govt will seriously think about our perks. I think all the executives will agree with me.0
R SUNDARESAN
CHENNAI
9442114100
Date:20/07/2016
Organisational Pension, as per Pension Rules is calculated only on "LAST DRAWN PAY". When the pay is not drawn and paid to any person (retrospectively upon any revision), then it Pension revision does not arise. In case of any Central / State Govt Retiree, in case of any Pay revision on Pay Commission, on receiving orders conveying Table of Pay Scale(s) and their Revised ones on PRC recommendation, the following are the action: i) Pension Book of the Pensioner deposited to Pension Cell, will be entered with revised Pay as on the Date of Retirement, as per the PRC Order for implementation. ii) Pay as well as Pension, as the case may be and as per the letter, would be entered as due and drawn, in Pension Book and along with Net Arrears Payable. iii) Arrears would be credited to Bank A/c and Revised Pension would be paid thenceforth. This is the procedure in case of Retired Central / State Govt Servants. Whereas, in the case of BSNL Optees who have been taken for a ride to be cheated of any financial benefits as ulterior motive, recent letter of DoT on 78.2% IDA on 50% IDA merger (candidly having no mention at all on withdrawn 60:40 condition anywhere) mentions clearly that: Since such retirees from 2007 to 2013 are not drawn pay arrears on revision of pay on 78.2% case, the arrears of DCRG, Leave Encashment, Commutation, etc., cannot be paid. This is nothing but a clear cut case of selective and vindictive action biased against and towards all the BSNL Opted retirees, exclusively and explicitly. Happening of similar instance is literally impossible to any Central / State Govt Servants. This is exposing clearly that there is inherent animosity of denying any financial benefit payment to BSNL retirees. Further, if the pension paying authority fixed pension to BSNL retirees of 2007 to 2013, w/o drawing and paying arrears of pay and thence only the newly fixed revised Pension, (where fixing of pension itself is inadmissible as per Pension Rules), such act has to be treated as violation of Pension Rules. This can be challenged as wilful and fradulant deviation of Pension Rules of GoI which can be directly sued in the Court of Law. Freak and deliberate act of DoT to cheat BSNL Opted Retirees in particular against the commitment given in Presidential Order given to us at the time of absorption. If this order is implemented, it is to be construed that DoT (GoI) is bent upon denying financial benefits to BSNL Optees cum retirees at any time which is nothing but cheating. In such case, everyone of us should fight for declaring our BSNL Option to null and void on account of infringement of Presidential Order committed and given to us at the time of BSNL Absorption. Associations / Unions to wake up to prevent this dubious act to deny BSNL Optee cum retirees and demand in Unison for cancellation of order (ii) Publication of orders of withdrawal of 60:40 condition (iii) Pay Arrears of pay right from 2007 to serving as well as retirees, the pay, pension and any other resulting benefit amount of Arrears. Without this, we have to directly call for withdrawal of BSNL Option only. 1
ANSARI I A
WTR,MUMBAI
9423992208
Date:20/07/2016
Policy Please publish the questionaire submitted by our association.What basic pay we have demanded and wheather it will be fruitful.0
R SUNDARESAN
CHENNAI
9442114100
Date:20/07/2016
Organisational All websites claim that 60:40 Condition towards payment of pension to BSNL OPTEES is withdrawn. But there is no specific mention on this withdrawal through Govt order. Every one of us remember that this dangerous condition candidly inserted to hamper pension. With no mention of 60:40 withdrawal and denied financial benefits like arrears of pension,graduity ,leave encashment etc is denied again. It is well evident that there seems to be hiden agenda. This has to be studied by all to ensure our secured interest. If Govt continues such hiden agenda,why cant we claim cancellation of absorption. 60:40 cancellation order should be explicitly got published by DOT.Trade unions should demand and ensure issuance of 60:40 withdrawal order R.SUNDARESAN 94421141000
V. Maheswara Rao
Hyderabad
9440868500
Date:20/07/2016
Others Dear GS, what about filing of MA by corporate office in ernakulam high court in DPC case? No one is caring it seems that it is a strategic move to delay the case whixh is very unfair. Please act quickly.0
[ janardanan
kochi
9446538530
Date:20/07/2016
Others dear comrade, Kindly publish a revised and modified fixation formula for 78.2% based pay revision and consequent pension revision w.e.f 10/06/2013 0
Jogi
Hubli
9483456769
Date:15/07/2016
Organisational PRC suggestions submitted are vague and not mentioned about financial resources to justify PRC payout. No doubt, like last time, this PRC also concerned about affordability of PSU to bear the Pay revision burden. That needs to be highlighted. Else this report ll get deaf ears. 0
mayank
Bangalore
9483547799
Date:14/07/2016
Organisational Where is the source of funding for PRC. That was not mentioned in PRC suggestion report. PRC committee is much concerned about PRC implementation implications on financial health of the PSU rather than listening other things. That needs to be highlighted that balance sheet wont be afftected 0
PRASANNAN T K
coimbatore
9486105054
Date:14/07/2016
Policy sir, C.O. released an order recently about refusal of decline to promotion in many grounds. Some cases have been accepted and others refused. As a vibrant trade union we should not accept these kind of partition attitude.All officers promoted are in fag end of their carrier and a right way of respecting their service is only re-posting them to their home state and let them retire happily.Otherwise we in a way , it seems we are forcing them to go on VRS, WHICH IS NOT CORRECT for promotion policy itself.. Hence take necessary steps to stop this REFUSAL category. 2
View More