New Message

Click on the message to view / write comments
Posted byCategoryMessageComments Received
c.harinath
hyderabad
9491304656
Date:26/05/2015
Policy sir, as per the web news the seniority list of sde 1 to 5 ,is being persued by the honble supreme court appointed authrity and by 23 may list will be submitted , so for no news about it0
k. sridhar
rgmttc
9486100462
Date:25/05/2015
Others "During discussion CMD appealed to capitalise the recent free call facility offered to the landline customers. Large number of waiting list is generated at field units as a result of the offer. Special efforts may be taken to provide maximum connections and strategies has to be workedout at each SSA and Circle level with frequent interaction between SSA/Circle Heads and Forum leaders, CMD suggested". During the meeting this come out . But why such a good news not being well taken even by a single person or association ?. Seems every one is expecting the unexpected one. 0
narasimham
hyderabad
9490145339
Date:25/05/2015
Organisational The SLP filed by SNEA(I) in the Hon.Supreme Court against Hon.Kerala High Court interim order restraining BSNL from issuing JTO to SDE promotion is expected to come for hearing next week dated 09/05/2015 what happened to it 0
S.Bhaskar Gupta
Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh
9490182848
Date:20/05/2015
Policy With the experience of repeated and prolonged court cases on different issues, majority of executives have lost interest in promotions as they have no erstwhile charishma or financial benefit. In contract lot of loss in salary and disturbance in family at the age of 55+. You can test this through obtaining secret opinion poll. It seems many authorities are not sensitive and atleast sympathetic towards the issues. Since years together, the admin is giving same routine replies on many issues and we are meekly accepting them.2
Vijay Jha
Patna
-
Date:20/05/2015
Policy There sould not be any external MT and for internal MT there should not be any Probation period and syllabus should be of new technology Like GSM 3G,4G, CDMA WI-MAX,DIFF BB TECHNOLOGIES,TRANSMISSION FIBER etc.Sothat the study will benifit the BSNL.It is joking that An Executive having BE degree and 17 Years experience in DOT and BSNL have to study BE course at the age of say 42 years and this is not advantigious to BSNL.Assiciation should think seriously about this.Executives having passed LDCE 2007 are not given seniority numbers till now and their juniors(DPC Quota for SDE VY 2001-2002 are enjoying this facility. 1
lakshat
nagpur
942267845
Date:15/05/2015
Organisational For every promotion someone get hurt.so each time some group of people opposes some exam/dpc. No dpc ,no MT,No LDCE .no one is ready to give promotion to other group.no unity in officers.for all promotion deadlock we all are responsible.0
R.BABU
HYDERABAD
9490182161
Date:15/05/2015
Policy Dear Comrades, It will be beneficial to our cadres as well as to the BSNL to recruit eligible candidates among the Engineering Graduates working as JTO and SDE who have better knowledge of field operations than the outsiders whom the dept. is planning to recruit. Hope Association will impress upon the Management along these lines.0
rakesh sharma
shillong
9436701700
Date:13/05/2015
Organisational Dear GS, The recruitment of MT should be stopped as was assured to us long back. 0
Nageswaran A K
vellore
9486103900
Date:11/05/2015
Others Dear GS &GP Pl take legal steps to keep the LDCE 2002 2007 passouts seniority Bcs It is the basic right like filing SLP for JTO to SDE.0
Satyanarayana Rao
Visakhapatnam
09490139400
Date:08/05/2015
Organisational GS Sir The fifth item of our agitation DEMANDs includes amendement of MS RR for Civil/Electrical at par with Telecom & Finance streams of our BSNl, allowing all existing executives for promotion to the STS, which was addressed by us to the management in our previous letters. But ,strangely,it was not discussed with CMD on 06/05/2015 by our CHQ. Reasons may be unknown.Having included in charter of demands, It would be appropriate to demand for the same. Hope CHQ will react in a justified manner. 1
PothuRaju.Perikala
VIJAYAWADA
9440000557
Date:08/05/2015
Organisational Respected GS, As we have sufficient qualified DOT absorbed/ BSNL recruited executives are ready and competent to work at DE/STS level with sufficient experience. And as per RRs , SDE to DE, the minimum 07 years experienced executives with defined qualification are also available sufficient in number. It de motivates these executives by going for MT’s both internal, and external and as many people said it will be waste time of executives to study for this exam. The only way to justify the real worthiness of existing eligible engineering graduates is a special drive need to be taken by way of conducting special DPC prior to the notification for the recruitment of M.Ts for all the eligible working engineering graduates so that none of them lose seniority. Further I wish to emphasize sir, that no organization or company needs to go for an outside recruitment if at all the same qualified executive are readily eligible and available working in the company. Let our BSNL not lose morality and see that no official lose Loyalty for his organization Finally it is requested to take up the issue again considering all the material facts for the benefit of the company and officers as well, such that no Engineering graduate recruited in DOT/BSNL, would work with dissatisfaction just because he possesses engineering degree. With the above facts sir, I conclude and request you to take up the issue alleviate injustice to DOT/BSNL recruited engineers. Sir “Justice delayed is justice denied” Already the sufficient time frenzied to refute the justice to this DOT recruited Engineers group. So please at this time height the path to justice 0
Maruti Rathod
Hassan, Karnataka
09449850730
Date:08/05/2015
Others Sir, Please take up the case of 30% superannuation benefit. It was there in the 18-09-2014 dharna demands but it was missing in the demands of 07-05-2015 Dharna. During campaigning for the dharna program our young comrades queried the same. I was not able to answer and ignored the question by telling " that is CHQ decision ". Thus I was in a very awkward situation. Sir, kindly do the needful to take up the issue so that we can motivate others to join and strengthen our Association. SNEA(I) Zindabad 0
c.harinath
hyderabad
9491304656
Date:08/05/2015
Policy sir, when do we receives the seniority list of 1to 5 , any action is acivated. pl write to bsnl board once again0
Murugan
Tamilnadu
.
Date:08/05/2015
Organisational Respected GS As the DPC is getting lagged for years, include the latest year vacancy also in the ensuing DPC for SDE, DE etc. 2014-15 SDET vacancies also should be included in the DPC from JTO to SDE under seniority quota so that the entire 2002 batch also could get their promotion.1
rajeev
deoria
9453016299
Date:05/05/2015
Organisational Sir, What is opinion about MT rectt. in BSNL as notified recently.Is Not Mgmt. is playing games with us?I Think there should not be any concept of MT entry level. Please share your views.If Possible try to stop MT Rectt.3
ANANT DAMLE
kolhapur
9422054700
Date:01/05/2015
Others Kindly arrange to display D.A.rates for pay revision in1997and in 20070
Moinul Islam
Guwahati
9435599151
Date:01/05/2015
Policy Our organisation posted on 27/08/2014 after the judgement of Hon Supreme Court::::: Hon Supreme Court judgment dated 12.08.2014 on list No 6 & 7 seniority: The SLPs filed by BSNL and other individuals challenging the Hon Bombay and Ernakulam High Court orders quashing the seniority list 6 & 7 dismissed. Hon Courts directed BSNL to recast the seniority list based on “date of joining”. The seniority of about 5600 LDCE passed candidates of 2004, 2008 and 2013, promoted as per SDE RR 1996 and 2002 has to be fixed based on “date of joining”, putting a big question mark on the relevance of LDCE. Now the question is how this organisation has allowed BSNL to hold LDCE for JTO to SDE promotion against vacancy year 2010-2011 without holding DPC for vacancy year 2009-2010 onwards? Pl take the issue seriously and STOP HOLDING ANY LDCE NOW>  6
Pradip Kumar Das
Guwahati
9435000693
Date:01/05/2015
Policy Rule 206 and Respected Supreme Court order on this has changed the whole scenario in the department. This has nullified the necessity to hold any LDCE from JTO to SDE according to any vacancy year. As because the date of joining is the basis of seniority, then how competitive exam can be held for the vacancy year 2010-2011 without holding DPC for vacancy year 2009-2010, and 2010-2011? If it is done then anybody passed in exam will be senior to the people who will be promoted afterwards by holding DPC against vacancy year 2009-2010, and 2010-2011. This will be sere injustice towards the senior JTOs who have already completed almost 20 years without any promotion. Therefore IT IS OUR DEMAND TO THE ORGANISATION TO STOP HOLDING ANY LDCE UNLESS DPC FOR VACANCY YEAR 2009-2010, and 2010-2011 IS HELD.1
BD RAWAT
AGRA
9412210786
Date:30/04/2015
Organisational Respected GS, MT recruitment is not required,already lot of qualified DOT absorbed and BSNL recruited executives are ready and competent to work at DE level. JTO to SDE minimum 03YEARS exp.,SDE to DE minimum 07 years exp. TTA to JTO minimum 07 years exp. are required and for MT only 04 years are required and syllabus is like external MT and it should be like other LDCE/ internal exams. It will waste time of executives to study for this exam. If management is adamant for this exam then it should be first notify for internal only with modified syllabus of technical fundamental and deptt ruling etc.8
S.M.MAHAJAN
Panaji Goa
9422030004
Date:28/04/2015
Organisational RULE 206 and seniority disputes GS letter to CMD is very clear, all documents to be produced to committee. All seniority lists to be circulated through web sites.0
OK HARIDASAN
TYP KTM KRL
9447185130
Date:28/04/2015
Others WE ARE VERY HAPPY WITH SINCERE THANKS TO OUR LOVING BSNL AND MY COMRADS.BECAUUSE OF LDCE JTO TO SDE (T) 2010-2011 VACANCY YEAR ON 21-6-2015.I AM HUBLY REQUEST TO MY LOVING BROTHERS IN THE NAME OF GOD KINDLY AVOID ANY COURT CASE REGARDING LDCE. PLEASE NOT FILE ANY COURT CASE.....ONCE AGAIN PLEASE0
M.R.Ustad SDE Bijapur
Bijapur
9449853155
Date:25/04/2015
Policy Respected GS. Please take up the case of fixation of seniority in r/o. SDEs who passed Competitive Exam in 2007 0
...
BENGALURU
...
Date:25/04/2015
Policy RULE 206 and seniority disputes GS letter to CMD is very clear, all documents to be produced to committee. Some people are in hurry to get DGM promotion directly from 1985 TES Gr,B to DGM....what about DE and DE Regular seniority list?0
A.K.S.Thakur
jalandhar
-
Date:25/04/2015
Policy Basic difference between 1981RR &1996/2002RR are absence of inter se seniority between CQ & seniority candidates.But DOT/Bsnl mananagement could not clarify the clerical mistake for fixing seniority in the ratio 3:1/2:1.Now management may appeal for fixing the seniority vacancy yr wise. Other wise a failed candidates in a comp exam become senior to a passed candidate in bsnl.And no body will appear for LDCE in future and this will be great loss for BSNL0
Pankaj Saxena
Patna
-
Date:23/04/2015
Policy when one JTO appeared the comp exam as per RR & advertisement he was eligible for a particular vacancy yr/vacancy years.Also all those appeared were not eligible for all vacancy years.As per Honourable SC , qouta is there but not ROTA.Asthere is no clear mention of rotational policy between seniority & CQ candidates,the date of joining is to be decided between two groups.As all vacant posts are calulated as per year of vacancy and the exams were held as per vacancy yr, Respected GS should pursue BSNL management to appeal in honourable SC for fixing interseniority between seniority & CQ candidates vacancy yr wise as per date of joining.In this process to some extent the interest of CQ candidates may be protected. suppose a 1989 or 1991 batch JTO cleared competitive exam being eligilble in vacancy yr 1998-1999& 1999-2000 his seniority should be fixed in the above yr vacancy along with seniority & cum fitness candidates of that vacancy yr as per date of joining. As, there is clear mention of eligibilty for vacancy between different yrs & no of posts were declared for different yr, our association should pursue the case with the management for an appeal.3
View More